Comments on: Public Meeting Presentation – with Polling Results http://voiceomaha.org/2010/02/10/public-meeting-presentation-with-polling-results/ Pro-Voice Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:56:30 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: laboratoryrecords http://voiceomaha.org/2010/02/10/public-meeting-presentation-with-polling-results/comment-page-1/#comment-80 laboratoryrecords Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:36:06 +0000 http://voiceomaha.org/?p=219#comment-80 Thanks for your comment and for taking the time to review the polling results. The PPT presentation doesn't contain the actual numbers of respondents, but we will be providing those in another format very soon. VOICE aims to be transparent in all our efforts. If we advocate for transparency of our leaders, we must act with transparency, too. Graphs with numbers coming soon! Thanks for your comment and for taking the time to review the polling results. The PPT presentation doesn’t contain the actual numbers of respondents, but we will be providing those in another format very soon. VOICE aims to be transparent in all our efforts. If we advocate for transparency of our leaders, we must act with transparency, too. Graphs with numbers coming soon!

]]> By: Win http://voiceomaha.org/2010/02/10/public-meeting-presentation-with-polling-results/comment-page-1/#comment-78 Win Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:26:51 +0000 http://voiceomaha.org/?p=219#comment-78 Thank you for your efforts in posting the meeting's survey results. The graphs clearly show the _relative weighting_ of the attendee's responses to the survey questions. HOWEVER, there is NO VERTICAL SCALE on the graphs, so actual numbers of responses is not provided. Why not? Was this just an oversight, or is information intentionally being "controlled"? If the former, please respost the survey including the vertical scale. If the latter, please explain. Thank you for your efforts in posting the meeting’s survey results. The graphs clearly show the _relative weighting_ of the attendee’s responses to the survey questions. HOWEVER, there is NO VERTICAL SCALE on the graphs, so actual numbers of responses is not provided. Why not? Was this just an oversight, or is information intentionally being “controlled”? If the former, please respost the survey including the vertical scale. If the latter, please explain.

]]>